Over the past few decades, attitude towards tattoos in the workplace has changed. It’s now far more common to see a range of professionals and employees with tattoo in the office.
New research reveals that the opinion of body art in the organization has evolved so much that even a noticeable body ink is not linked to people’s employment, salary, or wage discrimination. An analysis found that salaries and annual earnings of inked employees were statistically the same from those without body art.
However, not so long ago, Forbes recommended that visible body ink still have an adverse impact on someone’s probability of getting hired. Most of the time, you wouldn’t know who is inked and who isn’t, although it’s becoming normal to see them in visible body areas such as the hands, forearms, or neck.
Tattoos in the Workplace | Yay or Nay
For years, individuals have pondered on whether or not body art should be a factor in hiring. And as organizations try to become inclusive and distinct, a question more and more human resource department find themselves asking is: what exactly qualifies as acceptable body art?
Body ink used to be regarded as a part of counter-culture. It’s reasonably an open declaration to say that for years, many people connected tattoos with bikers, gangs, and other strange groups that were considered to influence outside of the social norms.
Employment law on body art
Today, body art has grown tremendously and is accepted socially by more and more people, women and men alike, have them. Individuals with tattoos are employed in different industries and hold executive jobs as well as top administration positions. So, what’s an entrepreneur to do with someone’s tattoo? Is a tattoo a workplace issue, and what does the law say about it?
Employment law in the United States, and the UK, and other most prominent countries allows companies to ask employees to cover piercings and body art, at the workplace under the dress code. However, if a person has body art for a religious reason or if asking them to cover up could be viewed as unfairness, there may be a consideration for them to be provided to display them.
Who decides employee law?
Employment law mostly leaves it up to founders or the company to decide what is appropriate for employees to wear, including whether any body art or piercings can be evident. Some industries, such as the airline sector, are especially strict on the matter, while companies are much more relaxed.
Many organizations use their own preference and do ask employees to cover their body art. However, it depends on the nature, size, and placement of the tattoo, as well as if any colleagues have criticized or find it offensive.
Is body art unprofessional?
Today’s modern companies are more liberal and acceptable about the changes in society. Thus, it means that many employers are somewhat comfortable about tattoos in the organization. In an age where businesses are trying to make themselves as distinct as possible, it seems odd to judge an applicant or worker on something that doesn’t affect their capacity to do their responsibility in any way.
Even the army, who have traditionally been very concerned with regards to their employee’s image, are changing their attitude on body ink in the workplace. Both the US and UK army have lately authorized employees to have body art in certain parts, though there are notable exceptions as to what is allowed.
Your Company Policy
Most HR policies and strategies influence employees directly; it’s essential that you use your own judgment and perception when deciding what your plan and strategy should be. Are people outraged by body art? Do they liaise with customers that will view negatively on a tattoo? These questions should help you decide how severe your dress code strategy should be.
Additionally, any strategy and policy you determine upon must be made as understandable as possible. If choosing that you want all employees to cover their body art in the workplace, it’s good to be transparent why you have made this choice and ensure it is adequately enforced throughout the organization.
How is this influencing hiring talent?
The main reason for a body art inclusive work environment is that you don’t want to end up missing out on skills. Aisha Oakley, the head of HR outsourcing at the Bradfield Group, outlines that this kind of business determines the pool of talent, and automatically withdraws those businesses that have negative opinions of people having tattoos.
The last thing is you don’t want to miss the perfect job applicant- someone who could have a significant confident impression on your company – just because they are body inked. That doesn’t mean begrudgingly choosing someone if you’re not prepared to treat them fairly, either; if you’re going to have noticeable body ink in the company, you need to be confined to being comprehensive.
Look for Talent, Not Tattoos In The Workplace
Embracing and accepting your employees even if they’re inked or not could lead to a more comfortable ambiance. As employees who feel happy and fulfilled will contribute a higher productivity level. This will help in the growth of the business. With more individuals getting some form of a tattoo, it’s essential that you analyze the impact of potentially isolating such a big group from your workplace.
Traditional dress law and appearance norms are challenged in today’s time more than ever for the betterment of each nation. Do let us know in the comments below, what do you think about tattoos in the workplace?